Do you set the bar low in order to avoid disappointment in yourself?

Back in grade school, I used to imagine getting what to me was the worst possible result before I got my grades back for any important exam. "I probably failed or got a C...", I'd think to myself. Because that way, most of the times I'd be surprised with a B, a C + and in some cases, even an A! I hated when I thought I had done well and was hit in the face by something less than what I expected.

This strategy worked for me for a while. I set my expectations low on my performance in order to always prove that I was better than I thought and get a dopamine lift out of that. But then is this how I should judge myself with everything?

You'd think that's a lazy way to be and that I don't care much about my performance. But I didn't set expectations low for myself because I'm lazy and just want to get away with the minimum requirements, I did it because I was too much of a perfectionist, too hard on myself, or pressured myself way too much which caused a lot of stress. I still worked really hard, I just didn't like feeling disappointed if I didn't "measure up."

Now was I conscious of my doing this? No, I just discovered this about myself during a session with my ontological coach. I've been reflecting on what this means about how I view and judge myself...

What am I afraid of so much that I need to protect myself from making mistakes or failing?

Does setting the bar low for myself really give me the results that I want? Does it really protect me?

Am I actually accepting myself for who I am and being grateful for what I can do or am I measuring myself according to my mistakes and not giving any importance on my progress and achievements (even when small)?


Questions I've been asking myself as of late...

Recent Posts

See All

Two Monday blogs missed. I did it again. Did I miss them because I just know nothing of consistency? How in the hell does Seth Godin do his DAILY blogs if I can't even keep up weekly ones? Disciplin